Saturday, April 17, 2010
Obama criticizes mine owner, orders safety review
In the article "Obama cricizes mine order, orders safety review", the president discusses the poor safety administer by the mining industry, specifically Mass Energy Company. On April 5th a terrible accident occured in West Virgina, killing 29 people. Obama criticized the owner due to the fact that safety regulations were not inforced. This incident was the worst mining accident in forty years. When the mining company came back to defend themselves they used the process of denial. As discussed in class there are five methods used. The response to these accusations was denial. The company stated "We fear that the president has been misinformed about our record and the mining industry in general." They proceeded to disagree with violations made agaist the company and explain they are looking for the truth on what caused the incident. They explained they are willing to work with the government in order to reach the truth for the cause. However, the company is denying any fault for the cause of this incident. Obama later explains "we know what can cause mine explosions and we know how to prevent them. So I refuse to accept any number of miner deaths as simply a cost of doing business." Given the circumstances I agree with Obama. For such a serious incident to occur there must have been safety violations violated. I believe the mining company used denial in hopes to aviod taking responsibility for th 29 deaths. A better statement could have been used, explaining how they will change their company and the methods used to prevent any other additional accidents.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
sorry forgot to post the website
ReplyDeletewww.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/15/obama.mine.safety/index.html?htp=Sbin
After reading this blog, I agree with Obama and Chelsea in that the mine company could have done something to prevent the explosion. As stated in the article by Obama, "we know what can cause the mine explosions and we know how to prevent them", therefore, something could have been done sooner rather then later. Instead of using denial, they should use this as an opportunity to better themselves as a company. When something like this happens it doesn't help to point the finger, but rather learn in order to have preventative measures in the future.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your post and I like how you used the strategy of denial that we discussed in class. It is clearly shown from the article that the mining company does not want to take responsibility for those deaths, I mean who would want to be held accountable for the deaths of 29 people? Of course this wasn't the best strategy that could have been used in their rebuttal against Obama. As you stated they could have taken the fault for the incident and informed the public about how they would make changes and have bette regulations. More importantly, the families of those individuals who were lost will only feel worse knowing that they company didn't feel responsible and couldn't stand up and acknowledge that they were at fault. This was truly a cop-out way of handling the situation and company as a whole should be ashamed of themselves.
ReplyDelete